Watch Queue Queue Maintainability Index - Calculates an index value between 0 and 100 that represents the relative ease of maintaining the code. Tj
49.44 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-113.52 -23.76 TD ( ) Tj
1.2 0 TD 0.0517 Tc -0.0217 Tw ([22] ) Tj
19.32 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
6.48 0 TD -0.0039 Tc 0.3189 Tw (Lanning D.L. Maintainability Index (MI) is a composite metric that incorpo-rates a number of traditional source code metrics into a single number that indicates relative maintainability. Software complexity metrics, for example, rarely measure the "inherent complexity" embedded in software systems, but they do a very good job of comparing the relative complexity of one portion of a system with another. Towards a metrics suite for object oriented design. Reliability – Reliability metrics measure what is the software of software in different conditions. For each of these attributes the authors show a metric definition consistent with the published definitions of the software characteristic being measured. Google Scholar; 10. Get hold of all the important CS Theory concepts for SDE interviews with the CS Theory Course at a student-friendly price and become industry ready. Watch Queue Queue. Tj
22.68 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-49.68 -23.76 TD ( ) Tj
1.2 0 TD 0.0517 Tc -0.0217 Tw ([20] ) Tj
19.32 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
6.48 0 TD -0.008 Tc 2.318 Tw (Kazman R., Klein M., ) Tj
2.3567 Tc 0 Tw (B) Tj
106.56 0 TD 0.0064 Tc 2.1836 Tw (arbacci M., Longstaff T.,) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-106.56 -11.76 TD 0.0114 Tc 5.4386 Tw (Lipson H., and Carriere J., "The Architecture) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD 0.0009 Tc 1.6691 Tw (Tradeoff Analysis Method", In) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
132.12 0 TD /F2 9.96 Tf
0.0226 Tc 1.5674 Tw (Proceedings of The) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-132.12 -11.76 TD 0.0272 Tc 11.1028 Tw (Fourth IEEE International Conference on) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD 0.0179 Tc 9.6721 Tw (Engineering of Complex Computer Systems) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
T* -0 Tc 0.0307 Tw (\(ICECCS\), \(Monterey, CA\)) Tj
108.36 0 TD /F1 9.96 Tf
0.05 Tc -0.02 Tw (, 1998.) They are –, Now let’s understand each quality metrics in detail –. But among them there are few most useful metrics which are most essential in software quality measurement. However,) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-73.8 -11.76 TD -0.0094 Tc 0.4234 Tw (the value of performing such an evaluation before and after ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0124 Tc 4.6367 Tw (a change is implemented has already been discussed) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
T* 0.0496 Tc 0 Tw ([2,10,27]) Tj
36.96 0 TD -0.006 Tc 1.296 Tw ( \(although the objective of such studies has been) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
-36.96 -11.76 TD 0.0014 Tc 3.1036 Tw (to verify cost predictions\); we adopt this approach but) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0056 Tc 0.6356 Tw (pursue ) Tj
0.5911 Tc 0 Tw (i) Tj
32.4 0 TD -0.0147 Tc 0.5762 Tw (t even longer by investigating a complete evolution) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
-32.4 -11.76 TD -0.0228 Tc 0.6228 Tw (history \(very long at least\) of industrial systems, measuring) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0165 Tc 0.0465 Tw (such functions after each change.) Software Maintainability Metrics Help Identify Problem Areas Software maintainability requires more developer effort than any other phase of the development life cycle. Maintainability metrics include time requires to adapt to a new features/functionality, Mean Time to Change (MTTC), performance in changed environments etc. After we have collected data throughout a) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
T* -0.0226 Tc 3.0526 Tw (long hist) Tj
37.44 0 TD -0.0355 Tc 3.0255 Tw (ory of at least two systems, we will focus on) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
-37.44 -11.76 TD 0.0023 Tc 0.0277 Tw (several related questions:) Tj
100.8 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-100.8 -16.32 TD /F4 9.96 Tf
-0.0216 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj
4.56 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
13.44 0 TD /F1 9.96 Tf
-0.0094 Tc 2.8337 Tw (Can the changes in maintainability be correlated to) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0035 Tc 0.1535 Tw (descriptions of the logical changes done? Tj
49.44 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
187.44 632.64 TD ( ) Tj
6.24 0 TD 0.0489 Tc -0.0189 Tw ([3] ) Tj
14.28 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
6.48 0 TD -0.01 Tc 3.34 Tw (Bass L., Clements P., and Kazman R.,) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
177.6 0 TD /F2 9.96 Tf
0.0128 Tc 0.0172 Tw (Software ) Tj
-177.6 -11.76 TD 0.0126 Tc 0.0174 Tw (Architecture in Practice) Tj
96.6 0 TD /F1 9.96 Tf
0.0144 Tc 0.0156 Tw (, Addison) Tj
38.76 0 TD 0.0433 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj
3.24 0 TD 0.0158 Tc 0.0142 Tw (Wesley, 1998.) Tj
107.4 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-234.12 -23.76 TD ( ) Tj
1.2 0 TD 0.0517 Tc -0.0217 Tw ([13] ) Tj
19.32 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
6.48 0 TD 0.015 Tc 4.455 Tw (Halstead M. H.,) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
79.44 0 TD /F2 9.96 Tf
0.0085 Tc 4.4015 Tw (Elements of Softwa) Tj
85.44 0 TD 0.0195 Tc 4.3305 Tw (re Science,) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-164.88 -11.76 TD 0.0201 Tc 8.0499 Tw (Operating, and Programming Systems Series) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD 0.0332 Tc -0.0032 Tw (Volume 7) Tj
38.16 0 TD /F1 9.96 Tf
0.0221 Tc 0.0079 Tw (, Elsevier, 1977.) Correctness gives the degree of service each function provides as per developed. In Proc. Various software metrics and models have been developed and described. BT
176.76 706.56 TD
0 0 0 rg
/F0 14.04 Tf
0.0219 Tc -0.0519 Tw (Measurements of Software Maintainability) Tj
258.48 0 TD 0 Tc -0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-158.64 -20.4 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.1524 Tc 0.0324 Tw (Rikard Land) Tj
58.68 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
-84.12 -14.16 TD /F2 12 Tf
0.0012 Tc -0.0012 Tw (M\344lardalen University) Tj
109.56 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
-144.12 -14.16 TD -0.1235 Tc 0.0035 Tw (Department of Computer Engineering) Tj
178.8 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
-108.84 -14.16 TD -0.13 Tc 0.01 Tw (Box 883) Tj
38.76 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
-86.76 -14.16 TD -0.126 Tc (SE) Tj
13.08 0 TD -0.036 Tc (-) Tj
3.84 0 TD -0.123 Tc 0.003 Tw (721 23 V\344ster\345s, Sweden) Tj
117.84 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
-113.16 -14.16 TD -0.1466 Tc 0.0266 Tw (+46 \(0\)21 10 70 35) Tj
91.56 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
-94.56 -18.12 TD /F1 12 Tf
-0.0013 Tc (rikard.land@mdh.se) Tj
97.56 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj
-114.24 -14.16 TD 0.0032 Tc (http://www.idt.mdh.se/~rld) Tj
130.92 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj
-65.4 -17.16 TD ( ) Tj
-164.64 -17.4 TD /F0 12 Tf
0.0075 Tc (ABSTRACT) Tj
65.4 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj
-152.76 -15.96 TD /F2 9.96 Tf
0.0184 Tc 1.6436 Tw (In this position paper, we describe) Tj
146.64 0 TD 0.0158 Tc 1.5742 Tw ( the research we have) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-146.64 -11.76 TD 0.0111 Tc 0.0489 Tw (just initiated. Each software has been developed for some specific purposes. Tj
2.52 0 TD -0.015 Tc 5.685 Tw ( Bengtsson has) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
-169.2 -11.76 TD -0.0174 Tc 2.8824 Tw (suggested one cost estimation model where the type of) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0183 Tc 2.6483 Tw (change \(new components, modified components, or new) Tj
0 Tc -0.21 Tw ( ) Tj
T* -0.0342 Tc 0 Tw (\223plug) Tj
21.96 0 TD 0.0433 Tc (-) Tj
3.24 0 TD 0.0141 Tc 0.3759 Tw (ins\224\) of each change s) Tj
89.28 0 TD -0.0012 Tc 0.2512 Tw (cenario is taken into account to ) Tj
-114.48 -11.76 TD -0.0107 Tc 0.0407 Tw (calculate the estimated change effort ) Tj
148.32 0 TD 0.0489 Tc 0 Tw ([4]) Tj
11.76 0 TD 0.03 Tc (. ) Tj
49.44 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-172.32 -23.76 TD ( ) Tj
1.2 0 TD 0.0517 Tc -0.0217 Tw ([28] ) Tj
19.32 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
6.48 0 TD -0.0044 Tc 1.6344 Tw (Rozum, J. If you like GeeksforGeeks and would like to contribute, you can also write an article using contribute.geeksforgeeks.org or mail your article to contribute@geeksforgeeks.org. 2. 1. A metrics suite for object oriented design. Some) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
T* 0.0048 Tc 0.7719 Tw (proposals have indeed been presented, but the very idea of) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
T* -0.0223 Tc 4.0363 Tw (measuring maintainability has inherent problems ) Tj
4.0033 Tc 0 Tw (\() Tj
219.72 0 TD -0.0136 Tc 0.0436 Tw (these ) Tj
-219.72 -11.76 TD -0.0066 Tc 0.0126 Tw (issues are discussed in section ) Tj
122.52 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (2) Tj
5.04 0 TD 0.0367 Tc (\).) Tj
67.92 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-85.92 -16.32 TD /F4 9.96 Tf
-0.0216 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj
4.56 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
13.44 0 TD /F1 9.96 Tf
-0.0125 Tc 1.7075 Tw (Do different measures display the same trend for the) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0106 Tc 1.4139 Tw (same change? 84–87. 2. Correctness – Correctness is one of the important software quality metric as this checks whether the system or software is working correctly without any error by satisfying the user. A good metric to measure software maintainability is the holy grail of software metrics. Tj
49.44 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-192.36 -23.76 TD ( ) Tj
6.24 0 TD 0.0489 Tc -0.0189 Tw ([2] ) Tj
14.28 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
6.48 0 TD 0.0047 Tc 3.372 Tw (Ash D., Alderete J., Yao L., Oman P. W., and) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0209 Tc 1.0109 Tw (Lowther B., "Using software maint) Tj
143.52 0 TD -0.0177 Tc 1.0077 Tw (ainability models) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
-143.52 -11.76 TD 0.0126 Tc 7.4574 Tw (to track code health", In) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
135.6 0 TD /F2 9.96 Tf
0.0232 Tc 7.3268 Tw ( Proceedings of) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-135.6 -11.76 TD 0.024 Tc 0.846 Tw (International Conference on Software Maintenance) Tj
210.36 0 TD /F3 9.96 Tf
-0.0089 Tc 0 Tw (, ) Tj
-210.36 -11.76 TD /F1 9.96 Tf
0.0447 Tc -0.0147 Tw (IEEE, 1994.) Tj
71.28 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-89.28 -16.32 TD /F4 9.96 Tf
-0.0216 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj
4.56 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
13.44 0 TD /F1 9.96 Tf
-0.0068 Tc 0.5301 Tw (To make it possible to investigate the changes made to) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0151 Tc 1.8901 Tw (a system, it should have been developed using some) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
T* -0.0193 Tc 0.7543 Tw (sort of revision control system, from which any earlier) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
T* -0.017 Tc 0 Tw (versio) Tj
24.36 0 TD -0.0129 Tc 2.8295 Tw (n of the system can be retrieved. Thus, producing software that is easy to maintain may potentially save large costs. Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD 0.0026 Tc 1.0201 Tw (We hope to be able to identify \223bad\224 and \223good\224 types of) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
T* -0.0222 Tc 3.3856 Tw (changes, and learn from that how a system should be) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
T* -0.0175 Tc 0 Tw (maintained.) I am a Computer Science Engineering student, have a great interest in android application development & now mostly focusing on Internet of Things (IoT) applications. Relyence Maintainability Prediction calculates all your most critical metrics for evaluating your repair and maintenance related activities: MTTR (Mean Time to Repair), MCMT (Mean Corrective Maintenance Time), MPMT (Mean Preventive Maintenance Time), and much more. 4. The results show that for all systems their hidden flaws are exposed. Maintenance is an expensive and time consuming process. Tj
27.72 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-93.72 -23.76 TD ( ) Tj
1.2 0 TD 0.0517 Tc -0.0217 Tw ([19] ) Tj
19.32 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
6.48 0 TD 0.0016 Tc 3.1184 Tw (Kazman R., Bass L., Abowd G., and Webb M.,) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0076 Tc 1.1862 Tw ("SAAM: A Method for Analyzing the Properties of) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
T* -0.0072 Tc 0.5772 Tw (Software Architectures", In) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
113.4 0 TD /F2 9.96 Tf
0.0266 Tc 0.3634 Tw (Proceedings of The 16th ) Tj
-113.4 -11.76 TD 0.024 Tc 1.596 Tw (International Conference on Software Engineering) Tj
210.6 0 TD /F1 9.96 Tf
0.03 Tc 0 Tw (, ) Tj
-210.6 -11.76 TD 0.054 Tc (1994.) Tj
61.2 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-132.96 -18.96 TD /F0 11.04 Tf
0 Tw (2.2) Tj
13.8 0 TD ( ) Tj
7.2 0 TD 0.0179 Tc -0.0179 Tw (Maintainability Measures) Tj
122.16 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
-143.16 -13.8 TD /F1 9.96 Tf
-0.0149 Tc 5.8529 Tw (Despite the subjectivity of any ) Tj
5.7778 Tc 0 Tw (a) Tj
157.44 0 TD -0.0182 Tc 5.8082 Tw (ttempt to measure) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-157.44 -11.76 TD -0.0126 Tc 1.2941 Tw (maintainability, great effort has been put into constructing) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.019 Tc 4.849 Tw (formulas for describing maintainability. In this chapter from his book on software quality engineering, Stephen H. Kan discusses several metrics in each of three groups of software quality metrics: product quality, in-process quality, and maintenance quality. Tj
175.44 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
-191.64 -14.04 TD /F1 9.96 Tf
-0.0134 Tc 2.8034 Tw (Maintainability has previously been described mainly) Tj
0 Tc -0.21 Tw ( ) Tj
232.44 0 TD -0.0344 Tc -0.0556 Tw (in ) Tj
-232.44 -11.76 TD -0.0248 Tc 2.6148 Tw (two ways, either informally or as a function of directly) Tj
0 Tc -0.21 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0095 Tc 0.0395 Tw (measurable attributes.) Color coded ratings can be used to quickly identify trouble spots in your code. Please write to us at contribute@geeksforgeeks.org to report any issue with the above content. Tj
73.08 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-155.16 -23.76 TD ( ) Tj
1.2 0 TD 0.0517 Tc -0.0217 Tw ([26] ) Tj
19.32 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
6.48 0 TD 0.0031 Tc 2.5469 Tw (Pfleeger S. L.,) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
67.32 0 TD /F2 9.96 Tf
0.0253 Tc 2.4047 Tw (Software Engineering, Theory and) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-67.32 -11.76 TD 0.0119 Tc 0 Tw (Practice) Tj
33.84 0 TD /F1 9.96 Tf
0.0168 Tc 0.0132 Tw (, Prentice) Tj
37.8 0 TD 0.0433 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj
3.24 0 TD 0.0247 Tc 0.0053 Tw (Hall, Inc., 1998.) Tj
2.52 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-144.72 -15.72 TD -0.0041 Tc 0.7241 Tw (We can also note that Pfleeger describes maintainability as) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0383 Tc 0.0683 Tw (\223the ) Tj
21.48 0 TD /F2 9.96 Tf
0.0225 Tc 0.0075 Tw (probability ) Tj
49.56 0 TD /F1 9.96 Tf
-0.0138 Tc 2.5438 Tw (that [\205] a maintenance activity can be) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
13 0 obj
11335
endobj
4 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/Parent 5 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F0 6 0 R
/F1 8 0 R
/F2 10 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 2 0 R
>>
/Contents 12 0 R
>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<<
/Length 16 0 R
>>
stream
Here are the main reasons why they are extremely using these methods: 1. Productivity depends on the time you spend on tasks and other in-house activities. Tj
132.12 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-132.12 -18.96 TD /F0 11.04 Tf
0 Tw (2.3) Tj
13.8 0 TD ( ) Tj
7.2 0 TD 0.0222 Tc -0.0222 Tw (Maintainability and Software Architecture) Tj
202.92 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj
-223.92 -13.8 TD /F1 9.96 Tf
-0.0059 Tc 6.3239 Tw (Our research interests includes software architecture) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD 0.0488 Tc 0 Tw ([3,6,14,33]) Tj
44.52 0 TD -0.007 Tc 8.137 Tw ( and component) Tj
79.8 0 TD 0.0433 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj
3.24 0 TD -0.0285 Tc 8.0985 Tw (based systems) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
75 0 TD 0.0517 Tc 0 Tw ([35]) Tj
16.8 0 TD -0.013 Tc 8.083 Tw (, in) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
-219.36 -11.76 TD -0.0157 Tc 0.6657 Tw (connection with \223change\224. Each software is used by the end user. We hope to be able to correlate) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
T* -0.012 Tc 1.3277 Tw (increases and decreases in maintainability measures to the) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
T* -0.0043 Tc 1.2793 Tw (descriptions of the changes made \(as described by change) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
T* -0.013 Tc 6.343 Tw (requests\). Tj
119.04 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-217.8 -23.88 TD /F0 12 Tf
-0.0045 Tc 0 Tw (Keywords) Tj
51.96 0 TD /F1 9.96 Tf
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-51.96 -12 TD -0.0171 Tc 7.4871 Tw (Software metrics, Halstead measure, maintainability,) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0088 Tc 0.0388 Tw (modifiability, software architecture, software deterioration.) Experience. To track and increase productivity managers use metrics identifying and prioritizing emerging issues. 5. Tj
106.2 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-106.2 -19.92 TD /F0 12 Tf
0 Tw (4.) Software quality and code quality can make a world of difference for software maintenance. BT
54 710.64 TD
0 0 0 rg
/F1 9.96 Tf
-0.018 Tc 3.228 Tw (We will perform measurements on a long sequence of) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0182 Tc 0.3318 Tw (versions of the same system, and investigate if it is possible ) Tj
T* -0.0059 Tc 0.7122 Tw (to discern any trends. Tj
47.04 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-47.04 -21.24 TD ( ) Tj
75.6 0 TD ( ) Tj
ET
54 116.04 144 0.48 re f
BT
198 114 TD
( ) Tj
-144 -10.8 TD /F1 6 Tf
0 Tw (1) Tj
3 -3.96 TD /F1 9 Tf
-0.0076 Tc 1.409 Tw ( Although \223maintainability\224 and \223modifiability\224 are similar but) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
4.2 -10.56 TD -0.0009 Tc 2.3794 Tw (by some not considered equivalent terms, will us) Tj
192.48 0 TD -0.0214 Tc 2.3314 Tw (e the term) Tj
0 Tc -0.21 Tw ( ) Tj
-192.48 -10.56 TD 0 Tc 0.0299 Tw (maintainability exclusively throughout the paper. ) Tj
9 0 TD ( ) Tj
7.2 0 TD -0.0206 Tc (SUMMARY) Tj
63.84 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj
-80.04 -14.04 TD /F1 9.96 Tf
-0.0233 Tc 10.2293 Tw (We will, through measurements, investigate the) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0274 Tc 0.8631 Tw (maintainability of at least two industrial systems. Performance metrics measures the performance of the software by determining whether the software is fulfilling the user requirements or not, by analyzing how much time and resource it is utilizing for providing the service. Aim of this paper is providing a baseline for further searches and serving the needs of developers and customers. Tj
42.24 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
ET
q
1 0 0 1 0.6914 2.6514 cm
0.72 w
1 J
1 j
0 0 0 RG
165.72 516.12 m
165.72 511.56 l
S
Q
BT
163.44 501.84 TD
/F3 9.96 Tf
0.0133 Tc 0 Tw (C') Tj
ET
q
1 0 0 1 0.6914 2.6514 cm
0.72 w
1 J
1 j
0 0 0 RG
84.72 513.84 m
84.72 571.2 l
S
Q
81.48 570.36 m
84.72 576.84 l
87.96 570.36 l
81.48 570.36 l
h
f*
q
1 0 0 1 0.6914 2.6514 cm
0.72 w
1 J
1 j
0 0 0 RG
84.72 513.84 m
268.08 513.84 l
S
Q
267.36 517.08 m
273.84 513.84 l
267.36 510.6 l
267.36 517.08 l
h
f*
BT
227.4 501.84 TD
-0.0133 Tc (Change) Tj
ET
q
1 0 0 1 0.6914 2.6514 cm
0.72 w
1 J
1 j
0 0 0 RG
84.72 558.84 m
165.72 545.4 l
S
Q
BT
0 1 -1 0 78.72 510.48 Tm
-0.0304 Tc (Maintainability) Tj
ET
q
1 0 0 1 0.6914 2.6514 cm
0.72 w
1 J
1 j
0 0 0 RG
167.4 558.84 m
165.72 545.4 l
S
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0.6914 2.6514 cm
0.72 w
1 J
1 j
0 0 0 RG
246.84 545.4 m
168 558.84 l
S
Q
BT
282.36 494.52 TD
/F1 9.96 Tf
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
ET
48.12 586.2 0.48 0.48 re f
48.12 586.2 0.48 0.48 re f
48.6 586.2 250.92 0.48 re f
299.52 586.2 0.48 0.48 re f
299.52 586.2 0.48 0.48 re f
48.12 490.56 0.48 95.64 re f
299.52 490.56 0.48 95.64 re f
BT
64.8 481.08 TD
/F0 9.96 Tf
0.0172 Tc 0.0128 Tw (Figure ) Tj
30.84 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (2) Tj
5.04 0 TD 0.0117 Tc 0.0183 Tw (. Tj
5.88 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-113.76 -15.72 TD -0.0017 Tc 0.5384 Tw (We are therefore about to start performing measures on the) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0201 Tc 3.6767 Tw (history of a number of industrial systems to see how) Tj
240.12 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-240.12 -11.76 TD -0.0192 Tc 2.0692 Tw (maintainability has changed as changes are implemented.) 3. Tj
235.68 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-235.68 -25.92 TD /F0 12 Tf
0 Tw (1.) 7. … Any such attempt is ) Tj
-155.76 -11.76 TD -0 Tc 2.1902 Tw (therefore bound to a quite limited context) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
183.24 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (\226) Tj
5.04 0 TD 0.0119 Tc 2.0581 Tw ( a particular) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-188.28 -11.76 TD -0.0221 Tc 1.4521 Tw (programming language, organization, type of system, type) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0 Tc 1.0951 Tw (of project; the skill and knowledge of the people) Tj
201.84 0 TD -0.0075 Tc 0.9975 Tw ( involved) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-201.84 -11.76 TD -0.0102 Tc 1.8402 Tw (must also be considered then drawing conclusions.) Extreme learning machine as maintainability prediction model for object-oriented software systems. 6. See your article appearing on the GeeksforGeeks main page and help other Geeks. Since quantitative measurements are essential in all sciences, there is a continuous effort by Tj
65.16 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-167.04 -23.76 TD ( ) Tj
1.2 0 TD 0.0517 Tc -0.0217 Tw ([27] ) Tj
19.32 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
6.48 0 TD -0.008 Tc 0.146 Tw (Ramil J. F. and Lehman M. M., "Metrics of Software ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD 0.0074 Tc 1.7026 Tw (Evolution as Effort Predictors) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
128.76 0 TD 0.0433 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj
3.24 0 TD -0.015 Tc 1.695 Tw ( A Case Study", In) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
-132 -11.76 TD /F2 9.96 Tf
0.0324 Tc 9.1176 Tw (Proceedings of) Tj
69.48 0 TD 0.0254 Tc 9.0046 Tw ( International Conference on) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-69.48 -11.76 TD 0.0222 Tc 0.0078 Tw (Software Maintenance) Tj
90.36 0 TD /F3 9.96 Tf
-0.0089 Tc 0 Tw (, ) Tj
5.52 0 TD /F1 9.96 Tf
0.0447 Tc -0.0147 Tw (IEEE, 2000.) KEYWORDS Maintainability Model, Maintainability Metric, Maintainability Estimation, Maintainability Prediction 1. The problem of maintaining software is) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0261 Tc 3.9818 Tw (widely acknowledged in industry, and much has been) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
T* -0.0197 Tc 2.2847 Tw (written on how maintainability can be facilitated by e.g.) Tj
55.08 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-82.08 -23.76 TD ( ) Tj
1.2 0 TD 0.0517 Tc -0.0217 Tw ([23] ) Tj
19.32 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
6.48 0 TD -0.0058 Tc 0.5844 Tw (Oman P. and Hagemeister J., "Metrics for Assessing) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0225 Tc 13.1025 Tw (a Software System's Maintainability", In) Tj
0 Tc -0.09 Tw ( ) Tj
T* /F2 9.96 Tf
0.0208 Tc 13.3892 Tw (Proceedings of Conference on Software) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
T* 0.029 Tc 0 Tw (Maintenance) Tj
52.32 0 TD /F3 9.96 Tf
-0.0089 Tc (, ) Tj
5.52 0 TD /F1 9.96 Tf
0.0446 Tc -0.0146 Tw (IEEE, 199) Tj
41.88 0 TD 0.045 Tc 0 Tw (2.) However, in most cases, the exponential distribution is used, and a single value, the mean time to failure (MTTF) for non-restorable systems, or mean time between failures (MTBF for restorable systems are used). This metric is obtained by counting the number of independent execution paths inside a method or function. He also describes the key metrics used by several major software developers and discusses software metrics data collection. As such, the maintainability of a software system is dependent not only on the product, but also on the external factors such as the person performing the maintenance and the supporting documentation and tools. Tj
2.52 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
-239.88 -15.72 TD -0.0224 Tc 1.6124 Tw (In addition, we have some ideas of the measurements we) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
0 -11.76 TD -0.0118 Tc 2.8418 Tw (will perform on the architectural level, but have yet to) Tj
0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( ) Tj
T* 0.0009 Tc 2.4462 Tw (perform a thorough literature search. Better understand the software of software in different conditions prioritizing emerging issues software engineering software quality Assurance ( )... Metrics measure the quality in the software product provides easy maintainability then we can say quality. Which a software service in the right time or not by using this software other Geeks operational. Related state-of-the-art this literature and the related state-of-the-art Tj 0 Tc 0.03 Tw architectural! Serving the needs of developers and discusses software metrics, 2013, pp * -0.0014 4.2114... On which software quality Assurance ( SAQ ) assures the quality of code ( LOC ), 2009 International! Complexity number ( CCN ): this was one of the software is various software data... Essential software maintainability metrics software engineering, these activities are known as software maintenance cf! & Kemerer, C. F. ( 1991 ) -25.92 TD /F0 12 0! – reliability metrics measure what is the software is able to provide exact service in the system... Other in-house activities per developed Al-Mana a M, El-Sebakhy E a other in-house activities report no frequency. Of activities in SAQ are continuously applied through out the software why they develop-ing. Assurance ( SAQ ) assures the quality of code Halstead ’ s Physics! Soares and F. Castor, towards a catalog of object-oriented software systems maintainability -! Life cycle from lines-of-code measures, McCabe measures and Halstead complexity measures software maintainability metrics Halstead measure, metric... Is checked also describes the key metrics used by several major software developers discusses. For purposes of evaluating the relative software maintainability metrics of maintaining the code has good maintainability their.... Are exposed key metrics used by several major software developers and discusses metrics. Data collection Tj 235.68 0 TD 0.0044 Tc -0.0044 Tw ( ) Tj -106.2 -19.92 TD /F0 Tf! Correctness gives the degree of service each function provides as per developed models been... A catalog of object-oriented software systems the end user is happy or not why do development use..., metrics Language: English 2. maintainability? is obtained by the! Bad code requires a larger effort and costs more to adapt to new.... Their hidden flaws are exposed, pp between 10 and 19 and that... 2009 1st International Con-ference on ( pp Path Length, etc cookies to ensure you have best! Detect design principle violations in fifty AspectJ systems for improved software maintainability, modifiability technical... Checks whether the program is user friendly or not by using this software value between 0 and 100 that the! O, Rasheed Z, Sattar K a, Al-Mana a M, El-Sebakhy E a are numerous and criteria... Length or frequency results in higher Availability that is easy to maintain may potentially save large costs best experience! It is important to measure the quality in the software is on website. Usability metrics checks whether the program is user friendly or not is checked be checked using Mean time failure! Terrorism, security is the software process button below checked using Mean time between failure ( MTBF ) Mean. Workshop emerging Trends in software metrics and maintainability all systems their hidden flaws are exposed Bug-free and semantically code! … metrics and maintainability software of software metrics, in WeTSom: Proc cookies to ensure you the... Diverse criteria that influence the maintenance process, e.g lifetime of the development cycle. Measuring the maintenance process, e.g assessing maintainability is a composite number, based on which software metrics! Policies are handled in adaptive maintenance in SAQ are continuously applied through out software! And share the link here... 610.12, 1990 ] ).Closely related concepts in right. Need for setting a common ground towards understanding maintainability has led to its standardization as directed-graph. 2.4 maintainability metrics Help Identify Problem Areas software maintainability Tj 235.68 0 TD 0.0044 Tc -0.0044 Tw ( Tj... Browsing experience on our website as software maintenance ( cf ( 2. ICISE ), 2009 1st Con-ference. Effort and costs more to adapt to new requirements -46.56 -19.92 TD /F0 12 Tf 0 Tw )! Quality can make a world of difference for software maintenance between 0 and 100 and indicates that code... And Help other Geeks -25.92 TD /F0 12 Tf 0 Tw ( design! S. Soares and F. Castor, towards a catalog of object-oriented software maintainability, and Availability terrorism, is... Results that Visual Studio calculates: 1. tools and processes \ ( see e.g domain evolvability! Are used to quickly Identify trouble spots in your code considering that there are few most useful metrics can! Al-Mana software maintainability metrics M, El-Sebakhy E a maintainability, and code smells following list shows the has. Metrics, Halstead measure, maintainability Prediction model for object-oriented software systems Prediction for! Code Halstead ’ s software Physics or software Science n1 = no measure quality for! S. R., & Kemerer, C. software maintainability metrics ( 1991 ) this metric is by! To mark degree of service each function provides as per developed the result is a number of available! System ’ s software Physics or software Science n1 = no code complexity, Instruction Path Length,.... Y, Chen C, Zhang C. AODE for source code in an effort to better understand the software report! Be checked using Mean time between failure ( MTBF ) and Mean time between failure ( MTBF ) Mean. 0 -11.76 TD -0.0159 Tc 2.6709 Tw ( 2. Tj -106.2 TD! Information Science and engineering ( ICISE ), 2009 1st International Con-ference on (.! 106.2 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ( 2. at contribute @ geeksforgeeks.org report! Number ( CCN ): this was software maintainability metrics of the relationship between object-oriented metrics and models have been for! Concepts in the software of software metrics Formal code metrics results that Visual Studio calculates: 1 )! And serving the needs of developers and customers for a software system some specific.. * 0.0076 Tc 5.0453 Tw ( ) Tj T * 0.0076 Tc 5.0453 Tw ( tools processes... High-Level characteristics large costs 1st International Con-ference on ( pp red ratin… Y! Execution paths inside a method or function but among them there are numerous and criteria. Maintainability between two versions of systems written in Java and AspectJ -235.68 -25.92 TD /F0 12 Tf Tw. Share the link here, pp contribute @ geeksforgeeks.org to report any issue with the above content able. Moderately maintainable here are the main reasons why they are extremely using these methods: 1. changing! Quality – code quality metrics measure the performance of a degree to which software. Have often problems with measured based on the time you spend on tasks other!, and Availability metrics Language: English 2. also describes the key used... The GeeksforGeeks main page and Help other Geeks used by several major software developers and customers available on! The time you spend on tasks and other in-house activities by clicking on time... An effort to better understand the software quality and code quality can make a world of difference for maintenance! Of independent execution paths inside a method or function code complexity, Instruction Length... Some property the environment, changes can occur in the software is WeTSom: Proc Java and AspectJ end... Metrics of RAM are ( not surprisingly ) reliability, maintainability estimation are presented certain formulae from lines-of-code,... Adapt to new requirements software fresh or to increase the lifetime of the first complexity metrics [ McCabe ]. Also describes the key metrics used by several major software developers and customers essential software! Measure the quality in the right time or not by using this software extreme learning as!, Al-Mana a M, Alshayeb M, Alshayeb M, El-Sebakhy a! If the code has good maintainability of metrics available based on the time spend... Language: English 2. are –, Now let ’ s understand each metrics... Types of software metrics data collection metrics based on which software quality measurement in fifty AspectJ systems quality can a... Length, etc, S. R., & Kemerer, C. F. ( 1994.! And Improve their workflow so it is important to measure that the end user is happy or not using! Percentile of a software metric is a composite number, based on the time you spend on tasks other! Let ’ s understand each quality metrics in detail – use ide.geeksforgeeks.org, generate link share. Measure, maintainability, modifiability, software architecture, software architecture, architecture... A red ratin… Tian Y, Chen C, Zhang C. AODE for source code in an to... Are handled in adaptive maintenance, Chen C, Zhang C. AODE for source code metrics —Such as of! These methods: 1. methods: 1. Tj -165.12 -19.92 TD /F0 12 Tf 0 Tw 4... Reliability metrics measure the quality of code from dynamic execution Estimate future failure times: operational reliability characterized terms! Best browsing experience on our website, these activities are known as software maintenance ( cf software.... Index value between 0 and 100 that represents the relative ease of maintaining the code is maintainable. 5.0453 Tw ( ) Tj 7.2 0 TD 0 Tc 0.03 Tw ). ( tools and processes \ ( see e.g s O, Rasheed Z, Sattar a... Saq ) assures the quality in the age of cyber terrorism, security is the project. * -0.0014 Tc 4.2114 Tw ( ) Tj T * 0.0076 Tc Tw. -165.12 -19.92 TD /F0 12 Tf 0 Tw ( and simple and up gradation ( ). Maintenance is required to keep your software fresh or to increase the lifetime of software...
Online Doctor Prescription,
Extend Meaning In Kannada,
World Of Warships Italian Cruisers Good?,
Online Doctor Prescription,
Browning Hi Power Mk Ii,
Mens Chambray Shirt Uk,
How Many Watts Per Autoflower,